Tag Archives: botany

Squashes Demystified

A Seminole pumpkin in my garden in suburban DC, a decade ago
A Seminole pumpkin in my garden near DC, a decade ago

A Seminole pumpkin in a CSA box a decade ago got me thinking about squash diversity. Market bins and seasonal displays that autumn overflowed with squashes, gourds, and pumpkins in a dizzying array of sizes, shapes, and colors, but I had never seen a Seminole pumpkin among them. My pumpkin was squat, round, and the size of a cantaloupe. Its smooth, matte tan skin exactly matched the exterior of a butternut squash. The dense, dark orange flesh in its interior matched, too. It turns out that there is a good reason for this similarity: butternut squashes and Seminole pumpkins are different varieties of the same species, Cucurbita moschata. The pureed squash inside a can of commercially canned pumpkin is yet another variety of C. moschata, the Dickinson pumpkin, developed in the early 1800s by a Kentucky farmer named Elijah Dickinson. C. moschata boasts numerous other varieties, names of which variously include “squash” or “pumpkin”, but it is rarely the most well represented squash species at the market. That honor usually goes to Cucurbita pepo, followed closely by Cucurbita maxima, two of the five species of Cucurbita whose fruits appear on our tables as tender-skinned summer squashes or hard-shelled winter squashes.

Squash origins

All Cucurbita species are native to the Americas, a dozen or so species with scattered wild distributions, mostly in Mexico. Cucurbita fruits were important dietary staples for indigenous peoples from Central America to New England. Domestication of at least five Cucurbita species predated European exploration of the Americas by several thousand years. C. pepo may have been domesticated in Mexico by ten thousand years ago, around the same time that wheat was domesticated in the Mediterranean.

The word “squash” is derived from askutasquash, meaning “that which is eaten raw or uncooked” in the Algonquian language Narragansett, spoken by some indigenous groups of northeastern North America. It may seem surprising to think of winter squash as raw or uncooked, but drying strips of the raw fruit was a common means of traditional preparation and preservation throughout the Americas. The Massachusett and Wampanoag peoples of New England had an additional word, pôhpukun, to describe the squashes they grew that “grow forth round.” This word was transmogrified into “pumpkin” by the 17th-century English colonists made famous by tales of the first Thanksgiving. The indigenous word was conveniently similar to the Early Modern English word for Eurasian melon, pompion, which was familiar to Europeans of the period.

Sugar pumpkins (C. pepo) in a market

C. moschata proved particularly hardy in the swampy lands of what is now the southeastern United States, traditionally home to numerous tribes, including the Seminole. The squash that now bears their name grows as a sprawling plant with the huge palmate leaves and curling tendrils typical of cucurbits, members of the gourd family (Cucurbitaceae), which also includes cucumbers, melons, and gourds (and loofah!). Accounts of early Spanish explorers to Florida describe Cucurbita vines twining up tree trunks, with their pendulous fruits hanging over rivers or decorating the dead oaks that the Native Americans used as trellises to farm the squashes. The large nutritious seeds inside the fruit were as important a food source as the sweet flesh. Unsliced fruit could be stored for months, protected by the hard outer shell.

Seminole pumpkin (C. moschata) vining up my house

Squash hardiness is usurprising given the means by which cucurbit lineages initially arrived in the Americas. The family Cucurbitaceae arose near modern-day India in the late Cretaceous, around 63 million years ago. The leading hypothesis for how ancient cucurbits migrated from the Asian subcontinent to every other continent except Antarctica is transoceanic long-distance dispersal. That is, either the tough-shelled fruits floated across the ocean, or the seeds were carried in the guts of birds. Ancestral cucurbits made the journey from Asia to Africa, and then from Africa to South America. The jump from Africa to South America happened approximately five times over the course of several million years. The descendants of those five founders eventually radiated into around 350 modern cucurbit species in the Americas. The genus Cucurbita originated between 9 and 23 million years ago in Central or South America. Cucurbita expanded its range into North America by the onset of indigenous American agriculture, around 10,000 years ago.

Five species, many varieties

Butternuts (C. moschata) in a market

Those northern radiations of the genus resulted in the three highly variable species that constitute the vast majority of pumpkins and other squash consumed in the world: Cucurbita pepo, C. moschata, and C. maxima. Two additional Cucurbita species, C. argyrosperma (cushaw) and C. ficifolia (fig-leaf gourd), are cultivated in a few areas, mostly in Mexico and Central America. Most of the squashes that come to mind when you think of “pumpkin”—large Jack-O-Lantern pumpkins, orange sugar pumpkins, squat mini pumpkins, giant pumpkins, white Casper pumpkins—are varieties of Cucurbita pepo. C. pepo also includes acorn squash, delicata, stringy spaghetti squash, and most of the summer squashes—zucchini, yellow crookneck, pattypans, and marrows. C. maxima includes the hubbard, turban, and kabocha squashes. Distinct named cultivars of these Cucurbita squash species have been developed through selective breeding over centuries, and most are totally interfertile within a species, and the species do occasionally hybridize.

Summer squash cultivars–especially the zucchini, yellow crookneck, and vegetable marrow cultivars of C. pepo–have been developed for their tender, immature fruit. These fruits are meant to be picked well before seed maturation. If left on the plant to mature, summer squashes will develop the hard rind and woody seeds that characterize their winter squash brethren. European explorers introduced hard-shelled American Cucurbita to the rest of the world starting in the early 16th century, and the agricultural development of summer squashes occurred primarily in Europe subsequently. Most squash varieties, however, have been developed under selection for various characteristics of the mature fruit. At least one variety in Mexico was developed primarily for the mature seeds—pepitas—a staple of Oaxacan cuisine.

Much is known of the genetic basis of the tremendous morphological variation among Cucurbita species. We largely understand the genetic architecture of fruit shape, shell lignification (becoming hard and woody), color, size, and beta carotene content (carotenes—Vitamin A precursors—make the fruit of most winter squashes yellow to orange). A white pumpkin, for example, expresses dominant alleles (gene variants) of two genes: Wf for white flesh and for weak fruit color. A warty pumpkin has a dominant allele of the gene Wt. The traditional orange pumpkin has the right alleles for many genes responsible for the synthesis of orange carotenoid pigments, especially lutein and beta-carotene, and the “orange” gene Or encodes an enzyme that directs the differentiation of specialized plastids in fruit cells called chromoplasts in which those carotenoids accumulate.

Summer squashes (C. pepo)

A particularly interesting gene unique to C. pepo called sp controls the stringiness of the fruit. When a hapless C. pepo inherits two copies of the recessive allele (gene variant) of the sp gene from its parents, the fruit flesh will have “spaghetti” texture, breaking into long strands when cooked. Hence, the name for “spaghetti squash” or “vegetable spaghetti.” Anatomically the strings are separated by bands of pectin that disintegrate during cooking. As cultivars of C. pepo, Jack-O-Lantern pumpkins, acorn squash, and over-ripe zucchini can also be stringy. If you cook up your Jack-O-Lantern pumpkins after Halloween, you might have to put the flesh through the blender to puree the strings. The flesh of C. maxima and C. moschata tends to be firmer than that of C. pepo, and it cooks up smoother. This is undoubtedly why C. moschata is preferred as the “pumpkin” of choice for commercial canned pumpkin producers, and why I prefer C. moschata or C. maxima varieties for any recipe that calls for pureed squash, be it ravioli or pumpkin pie.

Turning pumpkin carving into a botany lab

Amish pie pumpkin, a large and delicious variety of hubbard squash, Cucurbita maxima. That’s a 12-inch chef’s knife for scale.

Winter squashes are gloriously large fruits and are therefore excellent subjects for botanical observation. Carving a Jack-O-Lantern or cutting up a squash for a recipe becomes an instructive dissection when you know what to look for.

Botanists have names for different types of fruits. A squash is a pepo, a hard-rinded berry that develops from a flower with a single inferior ovary. “Inferior” means that the squash flower ovary is located within the hypanthium, the tissue that supports the petals and sepals. Squash plants make separate male and female flowers. Upon opening, the golden petals of female flowers are already subtended by a tiny squash—the inferior ovary and its protective tissue. The round brown circle on what we perceive to be the bottom of the pumpkin is the scar left after the petals and sepals fell off the developing fruit. As the fruit develops, the hypanthium tissue fuses with the outer wall of the ovary to become the exocarp rind, encasing the firm flesh of the mesocarp and soft endocarp. When you scoop out the stringy, gooey stuff and seeds from inside the pumpkin, you’re scraping out both the endocarp and the placental tissue that that connects the seeds to the ovary wall. The cavity of your pumpkin might look like it has lobes to it, called locules. I start the pumpkin carving by cutting out the lid around the “handle,” which is really the peduncle, the specialized stem that connects first the flower and then the developing fruit to the main plant stem.

Save the seeds! It’s a bit of a pain to separate the gooey fruit from the seeds, but salted and roasted pumpkin seeds is a real treat. Crack the hard seed coat (testa or integument) to reveal the olive-green-colored cotyledons (leaves) of the embryo, which take up most of the seed. The part of the embryo that will sprout roots is in the pointy end of the teardrop-shaped seed.

Seeds of ancestral Cucurbita species are present in fossilized mastodon dung deposits, which suggests that fruits of the genus were already adapted to dispersal by large mammals even before humans got involved with its evolution through domestication. There is evidence that some ancient Cucurbita species declined in geographic extent and abundance following the extinction of the animals that had pushed the evolution of its fruits toward large size and high sugar content. Humans arriving in the Americas essentially replaced the extinct megafauna and fundamentally changed the trajectory of the languishing Cucurbita, which in turn eventually became a crucial food source for the indigenous peoples of two continents.

I find this long view of the history of these plants and people to be a hopeful tale. It is as good an accompaniment to a Thanksgiving pumpkin pie as the whipped cream.

Someone's wildly inaccuarate idea of a soybean plant. the brand name has been obscured to protect its reputation.

Botany lab/rant of the month: that’s a magic beanstalk, not a soybean

In chaotic times, there are moments when you just have to take comfort in order anywhere you can find it. Katherine reviews some basic plant growth rules and takes a major company to task for undermining botanical literacy.

Would you buy milk from a dairy whose smiling cow mascot had an udder perched on top of her head? Would it bother you to see waiving teats where her ears should be? What if the unsettling image were wrapped in a lyrical ode to ungulates and to the steadfast farmers who rise before dawn to tap into “all that mammalian goodness”? Would a Holstein hagiography be enough to distract you, or would the contrast between carefully crafted ad copy and a negligent disregard for bovine biology trip your bullshit meter?

I think about this every time I buy soy milk made by one particular giant of the non-dairy milk industry. Normally I make my own soy milk – it’s cheap and fast and delicious – but sometimes life intervenes and I have to go with convenience. At my favorite local grocer, that means buying this brand. You might think it’s the gellan gum and the “natural flavors” that offend me, but really I just can’t get over the carton.

Have you ever really thought about the magic of plants?” the carton beckons. Well, yes! Yes I have! Like me, these producers have “been rooted in plant power for over 20 years.” Wow, we have so much in common! I am invited to enjoy “all that leafy goodness” and call them “plant-based, plant biased or just plain plant-prejudiced.” No plant blindness here, right? 

Except for this, the botanical version of a cow with an udder on her head and a tail growing out of her chin:

Someone's wildly inaccuarate idea of a soybean plant. the brand name has been obscured to protect its reputation.

Someone’s wildly inaccurate idea of a soybean plant. The brand name has been obscured to protect its reputation. Click to enlarge.

Judging by the edamame pod randomly stuck onto a stem, this altered photo is supposed to represent a soy bean plant (Glycine max). The words below (“Discover the power of plants at [redacted].com”) almost promise botanical accuracy. Yet, for comparison, here is an actual soybean plant, with its trifoliate leaves and bushy growth habit:

Soybeans in Warren County, Indiana

A soybean plant growing in Indiana.

Not only is the image on the soy milk carton clearly not a soybean plant, but the chimeric little sprout violates basic patterns of plant construction. When I showed the carton to my class this spring, the students were all over it with fervor and a sharpie.

Why it matters

There are many extremely important and urgent challenges facing humans and other organisms all over the planet right now, including some negative social and ecological impacts of soy and the potential for new tariffs on U.S. soybeans to make these worse. So why direct righteous ire against the photo on a carton of soy milk? First of all, what biology teacher (or parent or anyone) wants to see inaccurate or misleading images, especially if they appear every single morning on breakfast tables across the country? Second, at the risk of overstating my case, I believe that someone made deliberate choices about both the text and the image on this carton in order to evoke health and sustainability, but that these choices actually expose indifference toward the plants, the farmers, and the natural world. Similar indifference has gotten our species into a lot of trouble. We all get things wrong, but it’s important to try not to.

How a plant body is supposed to look

The green world is full of gigantic trees and tiny floating plants and delicate vines and cacti and orchids and palms and titan arums. Even if we leave aside mosses and ferns to focus on seed plants, it’s obvious that natural selection has taken a very simple basic developmental program and pushed it in almost every conceivable morphological direction. A common set of plant growth rules accommodates the varied forms of a quarter million or more species – which is astonishing – and yet the graphic designer for this soy beverage company somehow managed to stitch together an oddly improbable plant.

Under the basic developmental program, the set of stem cells (the meristem) at the apex of a growing shoot spins off a series of appendages (e.g. leaves) at regular intervals, arranged along the stem in a regular pattern. Most often, appendages spiral around the stem or occur in opposite pairs. The resulting basic vegetative unit is a leaf (or leaf homolog such as a bract, scale, or spine), the span of stem below it (the internode), and a bud at the place where the leaf meets the stem (the axil). A shoot grows by adding these units in sequence. New leaves continue to expand and internodes continue to elongate for a little while, so leaves near the tip of a shoot tend to be smaller and closer together than they eventually will be. Buds in the axils of the appendages may themselves grow out as branches that reiterate the basic body plan. The result is a modular and potentially nested structure composed of repeated subunits.

Basic flowering plant body plan

Flowering plants (and other seed plants) are built from a series of basic vegetative units, consisting of a leaf and an associated axillary bud and the internode below it. Axillary buds may develop into branches that are similarly built of a series of vegetative units. When plants begin to flower, bracts often develop in place of leaves, and flowers emerge from buds in their axils. Note that this generic plant is not meant to represent any particular species.

When a plant starts to flower, this regular organization does not go away, even if it is modified somewhat. For example, flower clusters (inflorescences) are generally produced at branch tips and along shoot axes where leafy branches would have emerged. And while leafy branches are associated with (subtended by) leaves, inflorescences are subtended by leaf-like appendages called bracts. Inflorescences themselves might transition to a complex branching architecture that differs from the rest of the vegetative plant body, but they still produce flowers in a regular pattern. Because individual flowers are conceptually (and evolutionarily) a bit like branches, they also are usually associated with bracts (Rudall & Bateman, 2010). A notable exception is plants in the mustard family (Brassicaceae); one of the genes that tells a meristem to switch gears and make a flower also suppresses formation of a subtending bract (see summary in Krizek, 2009).

Practically, what this means is that any branch, flower, or inflorescence should be associated with a subtending leaf (or bract, scale, or spine) and that any leaf (or bract, scale, or spine) potentially has a bud, branch, inflorescence, or flower associated with it. The regularity and simplicity of this fundamental pattern of seed plant development gives you a powerful framework for interpreting plants. You no longer have to ask what kohlrabi is; the leaf arrangement gives it away. You can use a combination of clues to distinguish a single compound leaf from a branch. It’s fun.

True, the pattern is not always obvious. Leaves and bracts fall off (although they often leave evident scars), and axillary buds can be extremely small or obscured. Leaves can also be reduced to tiny scales, such as those on a potato tuber. Flowers and fruits of the chocolate tree (Theobroma cacao) appear to emerge directly from an old branch, but in fact they are associated with long-gone leaf axils. And woody plants can produce new shoots adventitiously at their bases or when they are damaged. But we were talking about soybeans, not redwoods.

A magic beanstalk

Returning to the image that set off this screed, I might be able to see it as a harmless, fanciful botanical embellishment if it weren’t for the soybean pod deliberately pasted onto the stem. Surely these plant-prejudiced people could have paused their musings on the magic of plants and simply observed an actual soybean plant. They might have noticed that soybeans have compound leaves with three leaflets and that they grow more like bushes than vines. With a good photo, the artist could have gotten this image right without knowing anything at all about how plants develop. However, the text strongly implies that the central values of the company are rooted in a genuine understanding of plant biology, so I think it’s fair to hold them to a higher standard.

Now that I’ve said my piece, it’s time to take a virtual sharpie to that carton and make it botanically correct. Here’s my version.

Making soy milk at home

Homemade soy milk has many advantages. The beans for a half gallon of soy milk cost about a quarter of what you would pay for a carton at a store. Making your own is also more sustainable: bulk dried beans are less resource-intensive to ship than packaged liquid, you can often choose the source of your beans and how they are grown (e.g. organic from the U.S.), and you can control waste from the process. For example, I mix the solids strained from the liquid milk with salt, nutritional yeast, and whatever spices are handy and pack them for lunch. To the milk, I can add vanilla or not as I like. I can throw some oats or nuts or soy lecithin into the boil if I like.

  • 1 cup dried soybeans
  • water for soaking
  • 8 cups of water
  • dash of salt
  • 1/4 cup of rolled or steel-cut oats or almonds or cashews
  • immersion blender
  • fine strainer or cloth strainer bag

Soak soybeans in a medium saucepan (1.5 qt) for at least 6 hours. If you are using steel-cut oats, almonds, or cashews, soak them too.

Bring 8 cups of water to the boil in a large stock pot. The larger the better to reduce the chance that the mixture will boil over.

Drain and rinse the soybeans and return them to the sauce pan. If you are using rolled oats, add them here.

Pour some of the boiling water over the beans to cover them by about an inch, and immediately puree them with the immersion blender. Using boiling water denatures some enzymes that can cause off flavors, and an immersion blender is much safer than a regular blender for hot liquids.

Pour the blended beans into the large stock pot with the rest of the boiling water. Turn the heat to the lowest setting possible. After about 5 or 10 mins, put a lid on the pot and let it cook for another 45 mins. Add a dash of salt about midway through.

Do not leave the pot alone until it has been simmering without trouble for a while. The mixture has a tendency to boil over and make a huge mess within the first 5-10 mins.

Allow the mixture to cool for an hour or so and strain it. Refrigerate the milk right away.

The remaining solids can be flavored and eaten as they are, stirred into breakfast oatmeal or grits, baked into muffins, etc.

References

Krizek, B. A. (2009). Arabidopsis: flower development and patterning. eLS, 1-11.

Rudall, P. J., & Bateman, R. M. (2010). Defining the limits of flowers: the challenge of distinguishing between the evolutionary products of simple versus compound strobili. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365(1539), 397-409.

Botany Lab of the Month: Jack-O-Lantern

Happy National Pumpkin Day! Turn carving your Halloween Jack-O-Lantern into a plant dissection exercise.

IMG_7963

The first Jack-O-Lanterns were carved out of turnips in 17th-century Ireland. While the large, starchy hypocotyls (fused stem and taproot) of cruciferous vegetables are anatomically fascinating, this post will be about the stuff you are more likely cutting through to make a modern Jack-O-Lantern out of squash. Continue reading